Sunday, May 6, 2018

One of the Worst Things I Did to My Students

Excellence in Education: Dangers of Standardized Tests in Categorizing and Labeling Students

When SOLs became firmly entrenched, I became hyper-vigilant about ensuring my students were prepared for the year-end test. I combed over every lesson to make sure it was aligned with the state standards. I aligned my pacing guide with the SOL test blueprint (if 20% of the test covered classical civilizations, 20% of my instructional time was going to be spent on Greece and Rome). My tests mimicked the SOL--only longer.

On the first day of school I said, "We only have x-number of days, y-number of class periods until the SOL Test. Some of you should be aiming for 600s. Others for Pass Advanced. Everyone of you should expect to pass the SOL."

Not a single stunted sighed or rolled their eyes. They heard similar messages from their other core teachers and had heard similar messages for most their schooling.

SOL data was--and is--used to sort and categorize our students. Students with scores above 450 were pushed into Honors, AP and Dual Enrollment classes. Since I taught in the Freshman Transition Program (a team of five teachers working with "at-risk" students), most of my students were "sub-400s"

The days leading up the test were filled with review, practice tests, and statements like Look out for this and When you see this, it's asking about...

Students received a comprehensive review packet (10 pages of text, a PowerPoint filled with maps, charts, timelines and hundreds of unanswered questions waiting for students to answer them and honestly I was quite proud of how good this material was; lending it out to the other teachers and constantly tweaking it to make it better).

On the whiteboard was the SOL countdown (X Days Until the Test). To ensure students completed the massive review packet, I made it worth two test grades. Along with another teacher, I  ran SOL Prep after school. Other teachers offered extra credit to their students so they were usually well attended (I never offered extra credit but I now cringe at assigning 2 test grades to the SOL Review Packet).

The SOLs mattered. Grades and SOLS. Everything else took a backseat.

On test day, with one final cram session, I brought in fruits and snacks for the students. I'm glad my school never went all out and had a SOL Pep Rally, but we weren't too far off. 

One year, I had several students fail the SOL. I was beside myself. Saddened. I feared having to tell them the bad news. These two girls and one boy had made tons of progress. They qualified for expedited retakes but their cumulative SOL history didn't bode well. Comparatively they had actually done pretty well on this test. Individually, I called them to the hallway to share their scores with them. I gave them my best spin. I'm really proud of all you've done this year. You've made so much progress and learned so much...You're so close. With a little work between now and the retake, you can get a 400. 

I was sickened with the last part of my min-motivational speech. Saddened that I told my students that the SOL was most important thing, I realized the important message was that I was proud of them. I was thrilled with the progress they made. Why am I so focused on a score?

Educators can argue whether the SOLs or any standardized test measure learning or ability or some combination, but it's clear they don't measure progress. I was proud of the progress--academic, behavioral, and social--these students had made. How did I lose focus on this?

The next year, I quit the SOL Countdown. I minimized test review during class, instead deciding to reallocate the review days leading up to the test to dive deeper into subjects. So, instead of 5 days of review before the test, we spent an extra day on early civilizations and another extra day on Greece, Rome, Islam and the Middle Ages.

I stopped over-emphasizing the importance of the SOL. It was one measure, but I wasn't going to let it be sole barometer measuring my success or the success of my students.

When I made the change I was fearful. I had always told myself, "For my students, my SOL may be their only chance to earn their one verified social studies credit." Not to boast but almost all of my students passed the SOL, so I always viewed their graduation status contingent upon passing my SOL.

In doing so I shifted the focus from preparing the students for a standardized test to preparing them for anything. I'd like to think that they became true learners. With less focus on THE TEST, they read more. They wrote more. They collaborated more. Their questions became deeper and more meaningful. They explored conflicts, challenges and themes. They became better prepared for life.

Every day mattered. With less focus on a test score, I believe every student realized they mattered.

And a funny thing happened, the SOL scores didn't dip. When that day came where I called each student up to the show them their scores, some students reactions became more subdued. Of course, the "bubble" student or the student who rarely passed an SOL score still hooted and hollered when they saw their passing score. For the students who didn't pass, I think they felt better about themselves knowing the SOL wasn't the be all/end all.

As we begin our standardized tests, it's important that we don't lose focus of what matters. None of us became teachers so our students would pass a standardized test. We know AP and SOL scores do matter but let's not lose track of the our purpose.

Need to KnowsTech Newsletter from LEAD featuring a couple of our own!!

Faculty Meeting Google Slide Presentation 

Reminders about AP testing - Testing will run from Monday, May 7th  through Friday, May 18th.  Although AP exams do not begin until 8:00 AM or 12:00 PMall test takers have been asked to arrive to the cafeteria at 7:30 (AM exams) or 11:45 (PM exams) on test day.  Most of AP testing will take place in the small gym, but we will also be testing in the wrestling room and in the counseling office.  The tables and chairs that will be set up in the gym will be placed so that we adhere to the spacing requirements set forth by the CollegeBoard (the organization in charge of AP exam).  For this reason, once the tables are set up, we do not move them.  We are asking that the small gym and wrestling room not be used by other groups (classes, athletic teams, clubs etc) during AP testing.  Additionally, the main gym will be closed during Mustang Morning.

Each day I will email a roster of the students who will be testing the next day.  The absences will be coded in PowerSchool.  School policy for AP testing states that students are excused from their classes on the day of their AP exams, assuming they have given a signed note to attendance.  Athletic eligibility is not compromised by this absence, as AP testing qualifies as a school related activity.  If a student chooses to attend classes before or after their AP exam, please know that they might be arriving late or leaving early.  If a student chooses to attend school before or after an exam they are expected to participate in class.  They should not miss your class to study in the media center or spend class time studying for AP exams

Potential Senior Failures Due May 16 Please complete this form for any senior who is at risk of not passing your class at this time. If you have no seniors or have no seniors that you are concerned about, please complete the form and place "None" in the Student Name Section. It is imperative that any senior who is at risk is included in this report. Thank you.




Shout Outs
Great job by all of those involved in the Poetry Slam! As Michelle said in her email it was truly a team effort. Great to see so many students take so much pride in their work! 


Field Trips and SOLs


AP Tests (AM/PM)
 May 7: Chemistry/Psychology
May 8: Spanish Lang/Physics

May 9: English Lit (AM)
May 10: Government/Env. Science
May 11: German Language, US History (AM)
May 14: Biology/Physics
May 15: Calculus/French Language, Comp Sci
May 16: English Language/Macroecon
May 17: World History/Stats
May 18: Human Geography/European History, Latin

SOL Tests (AM/PM)
May 8: US History (Rocco, Waidelich)/US History (Lloyd)
May 9: Reading (Stallings/Shephard)/World History II (Reynolds)
May 10: Reading (Yachim)/World History II (Pippin)
May 11: Biology (Parks, Irving, Dove-Standard)/World Geography (Schafer, Team 2021)
May 14: Algebra 2 (Boyce, Eddy, Remchuk)/World Geography (Skelton--AA)
May 15: Algebra 2 (Harveycutter)/World Geography (Waidelich)
May 16: Earth Science (AA/Standard)/Biology (Honors)
May 17: Geometry (Remchuk/Robbins)/Earth Science (Honors)
May 18: Geometry/Chemistry (Honors)
May 21: Algebra I (Parsons)/Chemistry (Adv)
May 22: Algebra I (Lantz/Allen)
May 23: Reading (AP)/Geography (AP Students), World History (AP)
May 24: Chemistry and Biology (HMSA)/US History (AP)
May 25: US History (Dual Enroll)/World History (AP Euro)

Other Calendar Items
May 7: Teacher Appreciation Breakfast
May 8: Interim Period Ends

May 9: National School Nurse Day 

May 9: Potential Senior Failures

May 10: Teacher Appreciation Luncheon

May 21: Last Senior A-Day; Improv Night @7pm
May 22: Last Senior B-Day; Awards Assembly (see schedule below)
May 23: Senior Exams, Honor Society Inductions
May 24: Senior Exams
May 25: Senior Make-up Exams

May 29: Special Schedule (see below, no Mustang Morning), Senior Trip

May 31: Senior Awards Night
June 1: Senior Failures Due to Counseling

June 4: Anchor Day (no Mustang Morning, see schedule below)

June 5: B-Day Exams (see schedule below)
June 5: Graduation practice @ 10:30, Senior Picnic Follows

June 6: Senior Grades Due (4pm), A-Day Exams (see schedule below)
June 6: Graduation @ 7pm

June 7: 1/2 Day, Make-up exams (see schedule below)
June 7: Grades due at 4

Birthdays

May 8: Pam Bradley
May 10: Robert Ayres
May 13: Adam Southall

Useful Information
Activity Period Calendar : Club Day

Technology / Website Permission Request Form Please use this form to request use of a website or any resource that requires student log-in if the site is not already on the approved list. DART approved list




Worth Your Time
Tic-Tac-Toe in the Blended Classroom 

SAMR Model Simply Explained: Many of you are probably familiar with SAMR, I think this is about as good as any explanation

A Catholic School Tells Girls to Cover Up At Prom or Get A Modesty Poncho, Before Back-Tracking


Bell Schedules

Award Ceremony 2018
May 22, 2018
8:55-10:05       st Period
10:10-12:10     2nd Period


Lunch
Class
Who
1st
10:50-11:25
10:10-10:50
11:30-12:10
Green, Blue, PE/Health
2nd
11:35-12:10
10:10-11:30
Red, Purple, Other
12:15-1:20      rd Period
1:25-2:30        th Period
2:30-3:50        Award Ceremony
*Classes will be called over the intercom

AM CATEC: Normal departure,  Leave CATEC at 11:15am to return for 2nd lunch
PM CATEC: Depart Monticello at 12:10, Leave CATEC at 2:05 to return for Award Ceremony 


May 29-June 1 Bell Schedule
End of Year Bell Schedule
NO Mustang Morning
May 29-June 1
Mondays & Wednesdays: A-Days
Tuesdays & Thursdays: B-Days
Zero Period: 7:40 – 8:40
1st Period: 8:55-10:30 (95 minutes)
2nd Period: 10:35-12:40

Lunch
Class
1st: 11:10-11:35
10:35-11:10 and 11:40-12:40 (95)
2nd: 11:45-12:10
10:35-11:45 and 12:15-12:40 (95)
3rd: 12:15-12:40
10:40-12:15 (95)

3rd Period: 12:45-2:15 (90)
4th Period: 2:20-3:50 (90)
AM CATEC Students:  Normal Departure and return from CATEC by 12:15 (at CATEC from 9:10-11:55)

PM CATEC Students: Depart Monticello at 12:45




June 5-6 Bell Schedule

Final Exam Bell Schedule
June 5: B-Day Exams
June 6: A-Day Exams
1st Period: 8:55-10:25
2nd Period: 10:30-12:40


Lunch
Class
Who
1st Lunch
10:25-11:05
11:10-12:40
Green, Blue, PE/Health
2nd
Lunch
12:05-12:40
10:30-12:00
Red, Purple, Other, CATEC
3rd Period: 12:45-2:15
4th Period: 2:20-3:50

AM CATEC Students: Normal Departure and return to Monticello High School by 12:05

PM CATEC Students: 12:45pm bus departure



June 7 Bell Schedule

Make-Up Exam Bell Schedule
Session 1: 8:55-10:30
Lunch: 10:35-11:05
Session 2: 11:10-12:50
AM CATEC Students: Normal Departure and return to Monticello High School by 10:35
PM CATEC Students: Depart at 11:05 and return to Monticello High School by 12:50

Sunday, April 29, 2018

CSI and Numbered Heads Together

Excellence in Education: Color, Symbol, Image (CSI)
Last week's topic focused on discussions and ensuring inclusion of ALL students. This week's technique focuses students taking deeper dives into learning and offers the advantage of providing an opportunity for students who may lack language skills to display higher order thinking skills.

After learning about a topic, students;

  1. Choose a COLOR that they think best represents the essence of that idea
  2. Create a SYMBOL that they think best represents the essence of that idea
  3. Sketch an IMAGE that they think best captures the essence of that idea 


What kind of topics does this work for? Choose a topic that has different viewpoints and is relatively complex. Some good examples would be a speech, a scene from a play, a snippet from a book, etc.

How do you introduce this to students? While you are getting students to think metaphorically, it's not necessary to delve into What is a Metaphor? Before the students read, view, watch, etc explain to them that they pay attention to things that they feel are important, interesting or insightful. Also explain that they are going to be completing a CSI assign. It may be helpful to explain what a symbol is with some examples.

How do you support and assess students? Encourage your student to take notes as they explore the topic. You can ask questions and make comments through this stage, "You wrote interesting there. What'd you find interesting?"

The same can be done as students develop their CSI portions. Require students to share their work with a partner, group or the class. You may ask groups to share their favorite or most creative or most thoughtful color, symbol or image.

Throughout the process, pay particular attention to the students thinking. 

How can this be differentiated? This is a great "leveler" to begin with but it can also be differentiated by student readiness levels. For example, the content can be presented through different means. If it is a reading assignment, for example, you can level the reading in advance or you can provide more direct instruction for struggling readers. You can also partner students together as they read and/or partner them together to go through the CSI process.

You can also differentiate the assignment by allowing students to use their computers to complete the CSI portion. Also don't require students to draw their images; instead, a student may wish to use his/her word.

*Attribute for CSI Making Thinking Visible by Ron Ritchhart, Mark Church and Karin Morrison.

Excellence in Education: Numbered Heads Together 
As we're in SOL season, this oldie but good from Spencer Kagan is a great way to review for exams but it also works great with complex, higher-order questions.

How to:
  1. Students are placed in groups of 4. Assign each of the 4 a number (1-4).
  2. You, as the teacher, pose a question. Of course, it helps for students to be  able to see the question as well as hear it.
  3. Students individually think and write down their answers. Answers can be written on a their desks (using white board markers), individual white boards, on paper, or using their computers.
  4. Provide the students with a set amount of time to answer the question individually and provide them with a countdown as time is about to expire.
  5. After time is called, the group discusses the answer and works towards a consensus answer.
  6. Each member of the group should be able to answer the question for the entire group.
  7. Randomly call a number (1-4) and that student reports the answer to the entire class. Again, depending on the type of question, you could use this as a competition between groups by keeping score or by having all of the randomly called numbers write their answer on a small whiteboard. For example, after giving groups time to answer, tell them to erase their answers. Randomly call on a number and have all students who were that number write down the correct answer on their whiteboard. Then have them display their answers to you. It’s also great to ask follow-up questions too.  

Why it works?
  1. Each student is accountable, but the team approach eliminates fear
  2. It provides opportunities for students to talk and listen, making learning visible
  3. Appropriate grouping means stronger students can support struggling students without feeling “slowed” by them

Need to Knows
Tech Newsletter from LEAD featuring a couple of our own!!

Faculty Meeting Google Slide Presentation 


Field Trips and SOLs
May 30-May 4: SOL re-tests and transfers
April 30: Poetry Slam
May 1: College Signing and College Culture/Pride
May 2, 3: Digital Imagining and Photography Field Trips to IX Park
May 3: Celebration of Dr. Moran
May 4: Spring Musical Preview


Birthdays


April 30-Louise Weaver
May 3-Kelsey Terpay and Michael Schafer
May 4-Mary Morales and Jennifer Timms

Useful Information
Activity Period Calendar : Mentorship for 9th-11th, Senior Class Meeting for 12th

Technology / Website Permission Request Form Please use this form to request use of a website or any resource that requires student log-in if the site is not already on the approved list. DART approved list





Worth Your Time
What Does It Mean to Be a Successful Teacher? A Conversation with John Hattie

Racial Disparities in School Discipline Are Growing, Federal Data Shows

Using Vocational Education to Teach Academic Courses

What Happens to Student Behavior When Schools Prioritize the Arts

What a 'Nation At Risk' Got Wrong, and Right, About American Schools

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Two Discussion Techniques

Excellence in Education: Two Discussion Techniques
Throughout most of my student life, I was an introvert. Rarely--if ever--did I participate in classroom discussions. As teacher, I recognize the value and importance of classroom discussions, but getting all students to participate was as difficult as seeing colors in the dark. Socratic Seminars and its variants often fell short at being inclusive and responsive. I sought a way to increase participation, speaking and listening and engagement while providing feedback.

Below are two classroom discussion techniques that build on the principles of Socratic Seminars. Both techniques offer the following advantages:
  1. The teacher's role as a facilitator is minimized and the students take on more ownership and responsibility for the discussion
  2. As a teacher you're able to offer more feedback on both the content and the how the students conduct themselves when discussing. I believe the latter is probably more important in preparing students for life.
  3. The classroom becomes more silent. BUT this is a good thing as the conversations become deeper and more relevant, and students spend more time listening.

The Spider Web Discussion 
I've never used this as a teacher but read about it in a book by Alexis Wiggins, daughter of Grant Wiggins and an English teacher. Here's a video of the technique in action.

Why is it called “Spider Web” discussion? It's an acronym for several aspects of the discussion that are key to its success:
Synergetic – a collaborative effort with one single group grade (honestly, I'm not sure I agree with the group grade)
Process– it’s ongoing and practiced with a focus on feedback and improvement. 
Independent – students work while the teacher observes and provides feedback.
Developed – the discussion aims to be deep and sustained 
Exploration – an exploration of a text, essential question, or ideas
Rubric – a clear, concise rubric against which students can easily self-assess. Here's an example.

How's it work? 
In advance or in conjunction with the below steps, provide students with a reading, a video, an essential question, problem or topic to prepare for the discussion. In advance of the first discussion, it may be helpful to practice as a class. 
  1. Students sit in a circle. 
  2. Distribute the rubric.  
  3. Set a time limit. Wiggins recommends about 30 minutes for a first-time 9th grade class. 
  4. Accept the silence. Don't interrupt or correct them. If you're concerned about the students being able to conduct a 30 minute conversation, you may assign roles.
  5. While you observe, draw a circular seating chart. Keep the codes simple at first and add to them as students become more familiar. Here's an example. As students talk, connect them using lines. For example, if Liam is talking and then is followed by Luis, draw a line from Liam to Luis. Besides, the acronym, this is another reason it is called the Spider Web technique. If a student interrupts, place an "I" next to his/her name.
  6. Share the web with the students. The first time, the students will most likely be amazed and react accordingly (comments, laughs, etc.) 
  7. Have students self-assess.
  8. Debrief. 
Keep the webs throughout the year so you and your students can track progress and celebrate individual and class growth.

The Hammurabi Discussion
 Unlike the Spider Web technique this one doesn't have a catchy name (it's one I used--most likely stole form somewhere and I'm calling it the "Hammurabi Discussion" only because it was the first discussion topic of the year. Weak, I know. It differs in a couple of ways. First, the students are provided with specific discussion questions or prompts. Secondly, it is a more scripted approach.

How's it work?
Again, it's often helpful to practice with a topic students are familiar with, like school dress code.
  1.  Provide students with a reading, a video, an essential question, problem or topic to prepare for the discussion. 
  2. Develop 3 or more discussion questions around the topic and distribute these to the students. 
  3. Place students in groups of 4. Assign each student a role. These roles will rotate. The roles I used were Facilitator (student would read the question and facilitate the discussion in the group), Clarifier/Notetaker (student would take notes and ask clarifying questions in the group), Speaker (student would be the spokesperson for the group), Questioner (student will ask follow-up questions to other groups). 
  4. Have students discuss question 1 in their individual groups. They must reach a consensus or at least as close to it as possible. The speaker represents the group's opinion.
  5. Randomly call on 1 of the groups' speakers to start the conversation. 
  6. The student will then call on the next group. The speaker from the next group will summarize and react to the previous group(s), "We agree/disagree with...Our group...." This continues until all groups have the opportunity to share. 
  7. During the next stage, each group's Questioner will have the opportunity to ask clarifying/prodding questions.
  8. While students manage the discussion, the teacher is recording and is preparing to share feedback. A rubric similar to the one in the above example was used.
While the two approaches are quite different, they do share commonalities.
  • Grading and feedback should be used as a tool not a weapon. 
  • They both focus on developing student's soft skills and conversational skills. 
  • They both hold students accountable for their learning and growth. 
  • Shy students and the traditional class leaders must navigate the new terrain. Far too often the traditional class leaders control the conversation while shy students rarely participate. Both of the above approaches require equal participation.
Need to Knows
April 27: Student Award Nominations are Due (see Lisa Haney's email)

Faculty Meeting Google Slide Presentation 


Field Trips and SOLs
April 23, 24: Digital Imagining and Photography Field Trips to UVa
May 2, 3: Digital Imagining and Photography Field Trips to IX Park
May 4: Spring Musical Preview and Celebration of Dr. Moran


Birthdays

April 23-Dan Brown
April 24-Lisa Killham, Katherine Williams
April 26-Veronica Price-Thomas
April 27-Kim Morgan-Thomas
April 30-Louise Weaver

Shout Outs
We had a great spring concert! Great job by our music instructors: Katherine Williams, Shannon Hutchison-Krupat and Janet Whitmore! 

Useful Information
Activity Period Calendar : Club Day this weekend
 
Technology / Website Permission Request Form Please use this form to request use of a website or any resource that requires student log-in if the site is not already on the approved list. DART approved list


Worth Your Time
Teacher Suspended for Making Pancakes During State Tests Rick and I debated how we'd handle this one

Google Sheets Adds Checklists This is a cool feature!

Why Teens Cyberbully Themselves 6% of teens engage in digital self-harm

Pearson Embedded a 'Social-Psychological' Experiment in Students' Educational Software